MKBHD & Wallpapers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a833/7a8330e670006a271beacfc892c78f2d377fe0f9" alt=""
About a week ago I saw a tweet from Marques (MKBHD) advertising a wallpapers app. For those unaware Marques is a YouTuber who reviews technology and has been doing it for a long time. I trust him on reviewing technology and ~20 million other people watch him do just the same.
So when I saw this advertisement for a wallpaper application I was skeptical because I personally don't understand why folks would need more wallpapers than what the stock application provides.
I then saw the price tag for premium features: $12/month OR $50/year
This is a guy I respect during tech reviews shelling some application to his followers that had a huge optional price tag for wallpapers. Like I continue to think about this and can't fathom who would think spending a recurring charge on wallpapers is a good idea. Like this price rivals streaming services and these are wallpapers for your phone.
I can understand supporting artists and their work, but as I glanced photos of the wallpapers a large majority just felt like instantly generated AI creations so I wasn't convinced.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fbf5/2fbf5b7950d6f24c2819f0bdcbf90e8d5011bdb7" alt=""
I then saw folks online (Reddit) complaining about the permission requirements for this application and it looked like a serious set of permissions. Though I knew from submitting applications via work that you include one advertising library and all of these tracking permissions come along - unless you strip down your analytics to a bare minimum.
So then I started thinking - did MKBHD test his own application? If I tested my own wallpaper application and it requested location permission and more - I'd feel uneasy no matter the financial gain of such data. I mean I lose money monthly on Leaf, but it has 0 ads, 0 trackers and provides benefit to Halo players.
At this point I thought I was complaining about something when I can simply ignore it, which is true, but I had to dig further. I saw this quote from Marques (MKBHD) that showed the profit split was 50%.
We have a bunch of awesome artists over there that we are splitting profits with 50/50 and there’s already a ton of great collections of art and much more incoming...
https://beebom.com/mkbhds-panels-wallpaper-app/
It just seemed so odd to me. The app stores (Apple/Google) generally take 30% of all in-app purchases, but this profit share was 50/50. If you consider other services like Spotify or Etsy it ranges from 6% to 30%. So the infrastructure to host some images for download seemed like a relatively cheap cost per user, so the 50% cut seemed high.
So then I peeked the terms / privacy and it seemed like a ton of text for a simple application.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bea70/bea70387e1b70dd04e8366668318060db5f0c1f3" alt=""
However, I started thinking about the regulation around a marketplace and the legal department that may surround a highly popular YouTuber and it seemed at that point like a normal amount of text.
So at this point I was ready to just ignore this and call it a day, until I spotted a GitHub repository that had a bit of fun.
/$$ /$$ /$$ /$$ /$$$$$$$ /$$$$$$ /$$$$$$$
| $$$ /$$$| $$ /$$/| $$__ $$ /$$__ $$| $$__ $$
| $$$$ /$$$$| $$ /$$/ | $$ \ $$| $$ \__/| $$ \ $$
| $$ $$/$$ $$| $$$$$/ | $$$$$$$ | $$$$$$ | $$ | $$
| $$ $$$| $$| $$ $$ | $$__ $$ \____ $$| $$ | $$
| $$\ $ | $$| $$\ $$ | $$ \ $$ /$$ \ $$| $$ | $$
| $$ \/ | $$| $$ \ $$| $$$$$$$/| $$$$$$/| $$$$$$$/
|__/ |__/|__/ \__/|_______/ \______/ |_______/
Because selling out is bad
source redacted due to arguable theft.
It seemed this researcher discovered that the API in the application had no authentication between free/premium wallpapers. So they just provided a script that downloaded every single wallpaper from the application for free instantly. Now I can't really support that behavior, but I can sure confirm it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6955/d6955e29131f957de60f0a96454b336cc0329cd7" alt=""
So I started just summarizing this and it felt just sour.
- An ad/privacy-invasive application for the "free usage".
- An insane cost ($12/month or $50/year) for premium wallpapers.
- A marketplace chuck full of AI images.
- An application with no security on endpoints.
- An application full of ads for every single action.
The good news I can just ignore the application, however prior to ignoring it wouldn't be fair to leave out the updates and response to this negative feedback.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/682a1/682a1093c9d59ecc6a494761932eade66c03205f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb9ff/fb9ffd4c597a6661267bbccc03742f28e4aaec46" alt=""
It seems MKBHD is trying to course correct after a rocky launch of a product and the updates promised are being delivered one by one. I'm not interested in a wallpaper app and my journey investigating this application is over. The app may thrive or fail - I just won't know it.